The Testator and his Shaky hands:
The Supreme Court in SUSHILA DEVI v. KRISHNA KUMAR (AIR 1972 SC
2236) has held that in the absence of suspicious circumstances surrounding the
execution of the Will, the proof of testamentary capacity and the signature of
the testator as required by the law may be sufficient to discharge the onus. It
is also equally well established by the Supreme Court in P.S.SAIRAM
v. P.S.RAMA RAO PISEY (AIR 2004 SC 16 19) that
when it is stated that the hands of the testator were shaking and the testator
was unable to put his signature in the Will, the statement must be given due
weight. The Supreme Court in the above case held as under:-
"It is true that Sadasiva Rao was a literate person, but he
put his LTM on the Will reason therefor finds mention in the Will, Ext.D.13
itself wherein it was specifically mentioned that as hands of Sadasiva Rao were
shaking due to nervous weakness, he was putting his LTM on the Will. Even on
the Vakalatnama (Ext.P.28) defendant No.1 put his LTM, but did not sign it.
D.W.3 stated in his evidence that as Sadasiva Rao was diabetic patient and his
hands were shivering, he did not sign the Will but put his LTM thereon. The
testator, who died during the pendency of the suit, as stated above, was
examined as DW1 and in his evidence he had stated that because of nervous
disability he was not in a position to put his signature on the Will."
97. A Bench of this Court, in which one of us was a party,
in SAROJA
v. CHENNIMALAI (2003(4) CTC 330) held that when
the testator himself has stated that his hands were shaking and he was not in a
position to sign, that statement should be given weight, particularly when the
Sub Registrar of assurance has stated that the testator has affixed his thumb
impression at the time when the document was presented for registration in his
presence.
**
No comments:
Post a Comment